xmark vs Glasp
Glasp is social highlight-sharing. xmark is private semantic search.
why xmark?
Private by default
Your bookmarks are gated by row-level security in xmark. Nobody else can see them, including (by default) our service role.
Semantic search over full posts
Glasp surfaces highlights from a corpus you've curated socially. xmark searches the whole bookmark text by meaning, not by what you chose to highlight.
Chat layer on top
xmark adds a chat interface that answers questions with citations. Glasp has no chat surface.
X-native
Glasp can highlight tweets via browser extension. xmark goes via the X API — every bookmark you make on X (mobile, web, anywhere) flows through automatically.
feature comparison
| feature | xmark | Glasp |
|---|---|---|
| X bookmarks (via OAuth) | manual highlight | |
| browser-extension highlighting | ||
| social feed of highlights | ||
| private semantic search | ||
| AI chat with citations | limited | |
| AI-suggested tags | ||
| developer REST API | limited | |
| price | $5/month | free + premium |
the verdict
Glasp is the better choice if you want to share what you read and follow other readers. xmark is the better choice if you want a private, queryable library of your X bookmarks. Different products, different intents.
ready to get started?
sign up in seconds. free to start, no credit card required.